Sep. 6th, 2013

ysobel: (Default)
I have at least learned enough to (most of the time) realize that running out of cope is not my fault.

Training a new aide, and she keeps being convinced that she can do transfer maneuvers when she (thinks she) understands them, but understanding and doing are two different matters. Yesterday morning we got me on to the toilet ok, but couldn't get me back to the chair, and we ended up having to call someone to come help. She came last night for additional instruction; she was supposed to come this morning with a person that could be backup, but she decided after last night's session that she "understood" it and showed up alone. While she did have a better understanding of what to do, it ... wasn't enough. And we had to call one of my other aides, and wait for her to get across town, and by that point my foot was asleep, and so I couldn't really do much to help out with the transfers.

Yesterday I was perfectly able to cope. I knew, even if she didn't, that it always took aides a few days to get a good handle on the transfer. (My body is so very different than anyone else's. See also: the easiest way to pivot me upright when I am leaning back is to push on the back of my head. Neck and spine are thoroughly, solidly fused, and so that gives good leverage and doesn't hurt me. It's counter-intuitive, though.) I was able to stay cheerful, more for her sake than anything, and patient, and very "we will get this" levels of upbeat.

Today, less so. And now one of my other aides is here, and cleaning up, and I know that stuff needs cleaning up, and I want to have an organized space, but there is still a part of my brain having a "DON'T TOUCH MY STUFF" meltdown, and with yesterday's and today's stuff on top of the consistent feeling of augh, I am very very low on cope.

And in the past, being out of cope has led to being out of self-cope; to irritation that I can't just grin and bear it, or to the nonlogic that since I dealt ok with things the last time X happened I should be able to deal with them now and it is a horrible flaw and personal weakness that I wasn't.

Today, somehow, I am managing not to feel that way. Just to sit with my inner toddler and kind of cuddle her, and I don't have to make impossible promises, like "everything will be better tomorrow" or anything, just kind of *be*.

I think this is progress.

Whyyyy

Sep. 6th, 2013 02:15 pm
ysobel: (Default)
So I got to the question unit

for the record )

and AUGH SPANISH WHY are some of these q and some c? I mean, cómo I get, but why cuánto/cuándo and not quánto/quándo WHYYYYY

(Okay, so it's not the same sound, because cu is [kw] and qu is [k] and so it makes sense, *but* English qu is [kw] and so I keep writing quándo when they say cuándo, sob.)

ETA Another sob: Cuál es (which is it) and Cuáles (which-plural) sound the same wah.

#

In I-amuse-myself news, Duolinguo gave me "¿Cuándo bebes vino?" -- when do you drink wine -- as a question to translate, so of course I had to say aloud, in a super dramatic voice, "Yo no bebo ... *vino*..."

#

ETA Sentence of the day: Nosotros no tocamos el pollo! (We don't touch the chicken)

Previous sentences of the day (on other days) include Yo soy un oso (I am a bear) and Yo soy un pingüino (I am a penguin).
ysobel: (Default)
[15:26] <isabeau> sentence of the day, for today: we don't touch the chicken
[15:27] <Rainne_> ....
[15:27] <isabeau> Nosotros no tocamos el pollo!
[15:28] <Rainne_> looooooooooooooooooooool
[15:34] * Woggy toco el pollo
[15:35] <isabeau> no toco!
[15:35] <Woggy> ...yes, i know that's not technically right.
[15:36] * exor674 touches isabeau's chicken!
[15:36] <Rainne_> exor674 not without permission, I hope.
[15:39] <isabeau> yo no tengo un pollo
[15:40] <exor674> aw :)
[15:40] <isabeau> ...thereforos tu no puedes tener mi pollo

(ed. note: I haven't learned the translation of therefore, hence the spanglish butchering; and while I have learned poder, can/may, I haven't officially learned the construction for any sentences beyond "$SUBJECT can/can't", so was guessing that it took the infinitive. also I grabbed the wrong verb there)

[15:40] <exor674> I should go get a chicken for dinner
[15:41] <isabeau> (okay so I don't know therefore, and while I know "can" I don't know what verb form to use, but)
[15:41] <exor674> yeah, gtranslate doesn't know "thereforos"
[15:41] <Rainne_> speaking of chicken, that's what i made for dinner, and I need to go put some rice on.
[15:41] <Rainne_> bbs
[15:41] <exor674> but that comes out mostly intelegible barring autotranslate
[15:41] <exor674> "I have a chicken I thereforos you can not have my chicken"
[15:42] <isabeau> por la tanto!
[15:42] <exor674> er hrm, no, if I add a *comma* or something somewhere it's useful
[15:42] <exor674> "I have not a chicken, thereforos you can not have my chicken"
[15:42] <exor674> which I think is what you meant?
[15:42] <isabeau> yup.
[15:43] <isabeau> though I should have said por tanto tu no puedes tocar mi pollo (tocar, not tener, because I wanted touch and not have)

(ed. note: also tu should be tú throughout, but I was lazy)

[15:44] <isabeau> and why in frith's name is google translate defaulting to "translate into malay" >.<
[15:46] <exor674> because malay is fun?
[15:46] <exor674> ( also, touching chicken puts me dangerously close to being able to abscond with the chicken
[15:46] <exor674> so being unable to have it is also valid? :P
[15:47] <isabeau> tu no ... abscondes mit meine pollo *mixes languages with abandon*
[15:47] * Woggy giggles
[15:48] <Woggy> beware of poultry thief!
ysobel: (Default)
So in the quest for getting new shoes that I can actually stand in (which is generally athletic shoes, because I need a lot of weird-angled support), I have rather fallen in love with zappos.com because a) they have a good range of sizes, and b) returns are free (even the postage) as long as items are in original packaging and in good condition.

Mind you, I have super wide feet. Like, extra extra wide. I would have wide feet if my feet were normal, but the FOP toe thing makes them even wider.

And most IRL shoe places? Don't carry wide.

Even in men's sizes (which run a lot wider than women's).

So I tried getting a few things via zappos. My old shoes (which have lost all traction in the areas where I stand) were Rockport ProWalker in men's 7.5 wide, so I tried those in 7.5 XW (4E). Too small. Returned them. Decided zappos returns weren't too stressful.

Second attempt tried other things, of which my favorites were Propet Stability Walker Diabetic Shoe (except a 7.5 XX was too small, barely) and Propet Blazer (8.5 X) which seemed ok but on prolonged use was a little tight.

The thing is, my shoes have been black since forevers. (Because often with the wider shoes, it's a choice between white and black, and of those two black is better.) I do have some variety now -- mostly boots (a pair of ZOMG PURPLE boots, and then a pair of camel-tan pseudo-uggs) -- but the boots are hard to stand in and also not really summer wear, and the dailier-worn shoes are still very black.

The Stability Walkers? Black.

The Blazer? Brown and tan with accents of red and black

I feel like I "ought" to get the SWDS because they're probably somehow better. But I kind of want to get the Blazer just because NOT BLACK. And I feel guilty spending too much money.

So here, help me decide please!


Poll #14168 mis zapatos!
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 22


Which should I get?

View Answers


0 (0.0%)


3 (13.6%)

Order both and see which you like better
13 (59.1%)

Get both and keep both
6 (27.3%)

Ticky?

View Answers

Nom.
11 (100.0%)

Profile

ysobel: (Default)
masquerading as a man with a reason

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 03:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios